Posts Tagged ‘technology’

Group couponing; value for everyone!

Monday, November 8th, 2010

As of late, group couponing has become all the rage and Groupon has emerged as the premier service. They have a very rapidly expanding, diverse database of highly-activated consumers throughout the country.

It is the last part of that statement that is the most important; they are in touch with activated consumers. We have done work with other services with databases containing similar numbers of people. Without a doubt, Groupon’s consumers are the most activated and the most likely to buy. We have also found that the members of the Groupon database, at least in the Greater Cincinnati Area, are not just 20-somethings in search of a good deal. There are a quite a few “Golden Households” in their database, too.

We (IMPACT) determined this via a batch of group coupons we did for two of our clients. The first was a group coupon we did for Reser Bicycle Outfitters. This Groupon was for a ½ priced tune up and was run in the Spring. This Groupon sold over 450 tune ups. A repeat of that same Groupon in October yielded similar results.

Jason, the store’s owner, was so overwhelmed with repair work that he had to seek additional storage space for the bikes as he worked on them. For him, Groupon proved to be an awesome seeding tool both times. The tune ups yielded significant repair/upgrade work and parts purchase for his shop. In addition, it exposed new customers to the shop and positioned Reser Bicycle Outfitters to capture their sales when they upgrade their existing bikes or look for new ones.

Groupon was and continues to be a hugely successful initiative for Jason Reser.

Another initiative done by IMPACT that gave us insight into the diversity of consumers enrolled in Groupon, was for Totter’s Otterville in Covington, Kentucky. Totter’s Otterville is an incredible place where children learn through play, indoors and out. For their Groupon initiative, Totter’s offered discounted admissions ($8 admissions were sold for $3). We were all shocked when that initiative sold 4,587 Groupons. A little flip-flopping of the data set showed that there were 1,308 unique buyers in that list (there was a limit of 4 per person). 1,308 moms with kids bought this Groupon. Considering that Totter’s target market is NOT the 20-something single individual, we now respect not only the size of Groupon’s database but also the diversity of demographic and psychographic profiles in their database. Oh, and by the way, we have hear unconfirmed reports that Totter’s Groupon was the number 2 performing Groupon in the US… Hats off to us, Totter’s & Groupon. That’s impressive!

Needless to say, John Martin, the owner of Totter’s Otterville was very impressed with this marketing initiative. The Groupon was coupled with some in-store efforts to convert these new consumers to registered users in the Totter’s Otterville database. Many of these new consumers have bought annual passes to Totter’s Otterville and many more have come back, buying full-price admissions time and time again.

Group couponing appears to be an awesome seeding mechanism for businesses. From a marketing standpoint, we caution against using it to drive sales. It does drive sales, but at the significant cost of lost revenue (50% discount to consumers to drive sales of the coupons and the resulting revenue is split between the business and Groupon). It is important that the offer is constructed to be a net-zero for the business and that other initiatives/tools are put in place to convert new customers to future, full-price-paying customers.

If you need help constructing a Groupon or other marketing initiative that works for your business with positive return on investment, please contact us. We’d love to learn a bit about your business and craft new ways for you to build revenues in this difficult economy by making an IMPACT with your target market.

A whole new
world of Twitter…

Thursday, September 2nd, 2010

Affective August 31st, Twitter changed the authentication mechanism by which applications interact with the service moving from stored authentication to a system known as OAuth.

For those not inclined to read the Wikipedia article on OAuth, in a nutshell, it stands for “Open Authorization”.

To date, Twitter has worked via stored passwords.  So, in the case of tools like TweetDeck and Seesmic or online services like 4Square, people’s username/password strings were stored at the application level.  This allowed those applications to authenticate with Twitter as that person.

Obviously, this creates limitations with respect to what can be done and creates the opportunity for major security issues if username/password lists are lost, compromised or misused.

OAuth is very different. With OAuth, you actually authenicate directly with the service (Twitter in this case) and then Twitter and the application share a key (essentially like an HTML cookie) for the duration of the “conversation” so that the particular application can behave on your behalf without ever knowing your username/password combination.

This change opens up the “always on” capability of Twitter and more “network-aware” capabilities similar to Digg… which, by the way, utilizes not only Facebook Connect but also the new Twitter interface and the Google OAuth interface as well.

It will be interesting, to say the least, to see what people come up with.

Don’t know what to ask for?
Ask your vendors!

Wednesday, June 2nd, 2010

It is a common issue.

An organization has a need.  It is a BHAG (Big, Hairy, Audacious Goal) whose product is obvious but whose pathway is fraught with complex pitfalls and executional details.  To further confound the issue, the organization lacks the specific expertise to generate the RFQ and solicitation of an RFI necessitates significant human resources and implies existing in-house expertise to evaluate, parse and reassemble the data into an effective RFQ…

So, how do you specifically instruct some one on what you want built when you don’t know how to build it or what you should even be considering in the construction?

The US Government came up with a quite elegant answer.  Ask the experts and Web 2.0 it…

For quite a while, the US Government has be leveraging FedBizOps.gov to post government contract opportunities and to procure everything from pretty pictures to F-16 parts.  Even with a great tool like this, the RFI process is still difficult and the RFQ process requires expertise that may not exist internally.  To solve this problem, they piloted http://betterbuy.fas.gsa.gov.  Better Buy is a MediaWiki site where vendors essentially create the RFQ solicitation collaboratively which is then priced by each of the individual participants.

Imagine this post to the Better Buy wiki:

“Create a multi-channel awareness campaign that communicates  Federal Government and BP Oil efforts to resolve the current leak and spill-related damage to the Louisiana shore line within a budget of 2 million dollars, monthly.”

While see issues with this methodology, I think it is a beautiful way to get your vendors to create a best-in-breed solution that they all understand and can bid on with minimal confusion or doubt as to the desired executions and program plans…

Hats off to you, GSA!  This is a very interesting pilot that I hope proves successful and moves into other areas of the GSA acquisition (like the AIMS Schedule 541 work). I think it will both streamline acquisitions and level the playing field for all vendors involved in the pursuit.

Given enough time & good motivation…

Friday, April 30th, 2010

Just found this on Gizmodo

CRAZY stuff here!! These guys, put together an incredibly technical solution, leveraging an iPad, a laptop, wireless local networks, TouchOSC, Ableton, a python script from Mono, which allows them to wander around amongst the crowd while they DJ and rock out…

What I dig…  Their passion, creativity, personality and their pure pursuit of the cool which is driving the project.  Oh, and their mixing together of a handful of my favorite songs in a way that could “never be done with vinyl” was pretty impressive, too…

I can’t wait to see their demo of the “shake box”.  This functionality looks like it will add an even more tactile interaction and response to the whole setup.

Get to the 5 minute mark to hear the pretty cool mix they threw together using this crazy configuration…  The details are not for the faint of heart; sounds like they leveraged some of the best and brightest to make this magic work.

Oh, the tools made available to you when you’re a celebrity… or you have minimal responsibility and massive amounts of time on your hands.  So jealous… :)

Great work, Andrew & Andrew!

Interactive Print???

Monday, March 22nd, 2010

Modified 3/31/2010 to clarify privacy concerns at end of post.

Believe it or not, even print is interactive!

Way back in 2000, WIRED Magazine leveraged Digimarc to add watermarks to print ads.  At that point, reading the ads was only possible using a PC camera and, with the appropriate watermark software installed, would direct you to the advertiser’s web site.  Interesting, but not that useful.  Fast forward to 2010, the iPhone and much higher distribution watermarked ads and things start getting more interesting.

Much more interesting in fact…  A recent issue of Wired Magazine piqued our Creative Director Allan Godshall’s interest as the editorial proclaimed that print was once again interactive in Wired Magazine using technology from Kooaba designed for the iPhone.

Please refer to the press release from Kooaba (the company providing the technology to WIRED) and the specific release on WIRED’s site.

Using an iPhone and the Kooaba app, the ads could be “read”.  I’m not going to rehash my previous rants that questioned the value of iPhone app mania.  Nonetheless, this is pretty cool depending on what the action is on the iPhone when the ad is “scanned”.

If advertising using a tool like this, what action would you want people to take?  Would you have them do something that reinforced the brand equity?  Would you take the opportunity to grab consumer information?  Perhaps the ad would simply link to a page giving the consumer more information about the advertised product or service.

It would really depend on the strategy behind the print piece and the call to action.  Very rapidly, the capability of this technology forces clarification of the strategy and goals sections of the creative brief for that ad…  Back to the point; does this capability bring  privacy concerns to print?

Potentially.  In the age of variable printing and segmentation to a group of 1, who is to say that a advertisement’s watermarked print ad in your favorite magazine doesn’t contain YOUR subscription number?  When you click on that ad, viola, as you’re iPhone is getting directed to the advertiser’s web site, they happily make off with both your phone number and subscription number.  A quick mashup of that data and the publishers information about you and now the advertiser has something very valuable…  After all, that magazine publisher knows exactly who you are, where you live and probably a ton of psychographic and demographic information.

Considering this, are we going to see privacy statements on print ads in the future?

Despite the privacy concerns, we believe this is interesting technology.  If you’re looking to work some magic with your marketing, just ask us to bring some more IMPACT!

Call me a heretic…

Monday, March 15th, 2010

IMPACT seeks the business reason or problems before proposing solutions, strategies or executions.  When formulating solutions or pondering client requests, I always take a step back and address three questions.  Will a potential solution:

  1. assist in the acquisition of consumers
  2. shorten the monetization cycle by moving prospects to consumers more rapidly
  3. save the business money through optimization

This decision tree is particularly useful when clients are pondering “mobile solutions” for their business.  Don’t misinterpret me.  Mobile is extremely important to your business if it makes sense.  In addition, everything you do should be done in a manner that doesn’t inherently EXCLUDE mobile.  However, does 100% of your site need to be mobile?  Do you have to have a TXT messaging intiative?  Do you have to have an iPhone app for that?

Perhaps, but it is IMPACT’s belief that you should answer those three questions, first, in order to evaluate the value to your business versus the cost of the work.

That said, even I was surprised by the data in this article from Wired Magazine concerning Apple’s battle over gestures.   Based upon a  Strategy Analytics study, only 5% of mobile devices have touch screens.  In the next 3 years, that number is projected to grow to 30% but right now it is only 5%…

Ponder this for a moment.  This means that less that 5% of all mobile devices are iPhones and that only 5% of all mobile devices, worldwide, have a touch-based interface.  For all the hype that iPhones and Apple’s app store gets, it doesn’t seem to me that they have that much market share…

Could it be that Blue-collar American is still worried about simply having a phone…  and the $400+ super-sexy “app enabled” phones are nothing more than an item on a wish list a this point.

Just a little something to make you go, “hmmmm”…