Posts Tagged ‘iPhone’

Google Goggles…

Monday, April 12th, 2010

Today, Google announced the acquisition of Plink.  Plink is a niche application which allows you to take a picture of a piece of art and then Plink finds out information about it.

Leave it to Google to take it to the next level!


Google released Google Goggles for Android 1.6+.  This is an incredibly cool functionality that has been toyed around with on other platforms like the iPhone and by services like AroundMe.  However, Google took it to a whole new place that is phone independent just like Android.

Google Goggles can identify items such as landmarks, books, business card contact information, artwork, wine and logos with a simple snapshot (which, I might add, can be discarded right away with a little click; nice feature, Google!).

Looking up information on a location like a store or restaurant?  You don’t even need to take a picture.  Just point your phone at it and a link to the Google Local Business ad will appear at the bottom, beckoning you to click on it to find out things like contact information, hours of operation, coupons and more!

This is a pretty incredible extension of how search works and, if it works, will drastically alter how we use the little devices we all carry in our pockets.

Very nice, Google!  Very nice!

If you would like to know more about this or any of the topics on our blog, feel free to contact us at (859) 468-5313.  We’d also be happy to take a look at YOUR local business listings, and your interactive program overall, and let you know how they can be improved to drive your business forward.

Interactive Print???

Monday, March 22nd, 2010

Modified 3/31/2010 to clarify privacy concerns at end of post.

Believe it or not, even print is interactive!

Way back in 2000, WIRED Magazine leveraged Digimarc to add watermarks to print ads.  At that point, reading the ads was only possible using a PC camera and, with the appropriate watermark software installed, would direct you to the advertiser’s web site.  Interesting, but not that useful.  Fast forward to 2010, the iPhone and much higher distribution watermarked ads and things start getting more interesting.

Much more interesting in fact…  A recent issue of Wired Magazine piqued our Creative Director Allan Godshall’s interest as the editorial proclaimed that print was once again interactive in Wired Magazine using technology from Kooaba designed for the iPhone.

Please refer to the press release from Kooaba (the company providing the technology to WIRED) and the specific release on WIRED’s site.

Using an iPhone and the Kooaba app, the ads could be “read”.  I’m not going to rehash my previous rants that questioned the value of iPhone app mania.  Nonetheless, this is pretty cool depending on what the action is on the iPhone when the ad is “scanned”.

If advertising using a tool like this, what action would you want people to take?  Would you have them do something that reinforced the brand equity?  Would you take the opportunity to grab consumer information?  Perhaps the ad would simply link to a page giving the consumer more information about the advertised product or service.

It would really depend on the strategy behind the print piece and the call to action.  Very rapidly, the capability of this technology forces clarification of the strategy and goals sections of the creative brief for that ad…  Back to the point; does this capability bring  privacy concerns to print?

Potentially.  In the age of variable printing and segmentation to a group of 1, who is to say that a advertisement’s watermarked print ad in your favorite magazine doesn’t contain YOUR subscription number?  When you click on that ad, viola, as you’re iPhone is getting directed to the advertiser’s web site, they happily make off with both your phone number and subscription number.  A quick mashup of that data and the publishers information about you and now the advertiser has something very valuable…  After all, that magazine publisher knows exactly who you are, where you live and probably a ton of psychographic and demographic information.

Considering this, are we going to see privacy statements on print ads in the future?

Despite the privacy concerns, we believe this is interesting technology.  If you’re looking to work some magic with your marketing, just ask us to bring some more IMPACT!

Call me a heretic…

Monday, March 15th, 2010

IMPACT seeks the business reason or problems before proposing solutions, strategies or executions.  When formulating solutions or pondering client requests, I always take a step back and address three questions.  Will a potential solution:

  1. assist in the acquisition of consumers
  2. shorten the monetization cycle by moving prospects to consumers more rapidly
  3. save the business money through optimization

This decision tree is particularly useful when clients are pondering “mobile solutions” for their business.  Don’t misinterpret me.  Mobile is extremely important to your business if it makes sense.  In addition, everything you do should be done in a manner that doesn’t inherently EXCLUDE mobile.  However, does 100% of your site need to be mobile?  Do you have to have a TXT messaging intiative?  Do you have to have an iPhone app for that?

Perhaps, but it is IMPACT’s belief that you should answer those three questions, first, in order to evaluate the value to your business versus the cost of the work.

That said, even I was surprised by the data in this article from Wired Magazine concerning Apple’s battle over gestures.   Based upon a  Strategy Analytics study, only 5% of mobile devices have touch screens.  In the next 3 years, that number is projected to grow to 30% but right now it is only 5%…

Ponder this for a moment.  This means that less that 5% of all mobile devices are iPhones and that only 5% of all mobile devices, worldwide, have a touch-based interface.  For all the hype that iPhones and Apple’s app store gets, it doesn’t seem to me that they have that much market share…

Could it be that Blue-collar American is still worried about simply having a phone…  and the $400+ super-sexy “app enabled” phones are nothing more than an item on a wish list a this point.

Just a little something to make you go, “hmmmm”…